From this link we read about a website that seems to track folks who do the unthinkable … actually sue doctors who commit medical malpractice!
“HOUSTON, March 4 — As domestic security director for 16 north Texas counties, Greg Dawson of Fort Worth has many dealings with doctors and hospitals, preparing for a terrorism emergency he hopes will never come.
So, Mr. Dawson said, he was stunned this week to find that his name had been added to a little-known Internet database for doctors attacking “litigious behavior.” His offense: filing a medical malpractice lawsuit against a Fort Worth hospital and doctor over the death of his 39-year-old wife, whose brain tumor was missed, and winning an undisclosed settlement.
For months, an obscure Texas company run by doctors has been operating a Web site, DoctorsKnow Us.com, that compiles and posts the names of plaintiffs, their lawyers and expert witnesses in malpractice lawsuits in Texas and beyond, regardless of the merit of the claim.
“You may use the service to assess the risk of offering your services to clients or potential clients,” the Web site says.
For fees listed as low as $4.95 a month for the first 250 searches and thereafter 2 cents a search, subscribers are invited to search the database “one person at a time or monitor any sized group of individuals for litigious conduct.” They can also add names to the database “from official and unofficial public records.” Whether that could include a doctor’s own files is not clear.
“They can sue but they can’t hide,” says the Web site.
A founder of the group, Dr. John S. Jones, a radiologist in Terrell, near Dallas, declined to respond to questions, saying through a lawyer, Vincent A. Bacho, that he had given one newspaper interview and had agreed not to give another before it was published.
The sponsors draw no distinctions among cases in what they say is the first effort to use public sources to compile a list of litigants in “predatory lawsuits” that are causing a medical crisis. One couple was put on the list after winning $40.9 million over a botched operation by a drug-dependent surgeon.
Mr. Dawson said he recently had trouble finding a doctor for his son and considered it possibly retaliatory. “I thought how amusing, I’m blacklisted,” he said.
He said he learned he was on the list from Texas Watch, a consumer research and advocacy organization based in Austin.
Dan Lambe, executive director of Texas Watch, said: “Medical malpractice patients need more care, not hurdles. It’s offensive on different levels.”
One other doctor besides Dr. Jones, Hoyt Allen, is named on the Web site run by DoctorsKnow.Us, which registered with the State of Texas on Jan. 30, 2003. Dr. Allen did not respond to messages left with his medical office in Kaufman, also near Dallas. The group lists an address in Mesquite, Tex., that has no telephone. No one responded to messages sent to the group’s e-mail address.
The American Medical Association said that it had just learned of the group and that it saw no ethical issues at stake.
“There’s no question that physicians are totally frustrated by the relentless assault on the medical profession by trial lawyers,” said Dr. William G. Plested, chairman of the A.M.A.’s board of trustees and a cardiovascular surgeon in Santa Monica, Calif. Dr. Plested said the government already maintained a database of doctors who had been sued, for use by medical professionals.
“Is it fair to come to me if you’ve sued the last 10 physicians you’ve seen and never collected?” he asked. “Is it fair for me not to know that?”
The Texas Medical Association referred questions about the group to its general counsel, Rocky Wilcox, who responded in a short statement: “We are not a part of and, in fact, don’t even know who is running this service. The fact that it exists testifies to the continued frustration physicians feel as they try to care for their patients amidst the epidemic of lawsuit abuse.”
How many people are listed on the Web site or what happens to them when they seek further medical care is not clear.”
———SNIP——————-
The website that is being talked about in this 2004 article is still online and in operation.
http://doctorsknowus.com/is there. It has an austere, even foreboding appearance to me.
It is in direct opposition in form to a more friendly and appealing, and more consumer oriented site, http://www.texaswatch.ORG.
As a doctor who is oriented toward patients and consumers of healthcare, I like TexasWatch.com and believe that consumers and patients need to look to it for good information. TEXASWATCH.ORG ——-> rocks !
At the time, it seemed like a lot of paperwork, and somewhat of a hassle.
